National Conversation is SNP talking to itself

Q) When is a ‘national conversation’ not a national conversation? A) When it excludes the greater part of the nation which it purports to represent.

Rather than involve itself in the Calman Commission the SNP famously set up a rival ‘National Conversation’ purportedly to canvass views on devolution and independence, directly from the people of Scotland. But it transpires the pro-Union contributions are being omitted from the online constitutional debate.

In Ireland a tactic often employed to imply that Republican and nationalist symbols are the only legitimate representations of ‘Irishness’ is to accuse unionists of ‘excluding themselves’ from the nation.

Perhaps Scots Nat thinking isn’t so terribly different?

Comments

Anonymous said…
A few descrepancies in your poorly researched post.

Firstly, the national conversation predates the Calman Commission.

Secondlt the Calman commission explicitly refuses to discuss independence as one of a number of options, it's not that hard to understand why that might not be exactly inviting to a party whose core aim is Scottish Independence.

And in any event, the Scottish Government has indeed submitted information to the Calman Commission on fiscla powers and Mike Russell has signalled that he will input further but only on the basis that the Scottish Government states it's preference for normal independence.

You reference to 'unionist' posts being censored comes second via the Scotsman, via Lord Foulkes (Labour and Unionist spinner in chief) via a pensioner.

You've got to ask yourself, who contacts their MSP because they had a few posts deleted on a forum (that's if it ever actually happened)

Unlike the Calman Commission, the National Conversation is considering every opotion, to date the Calman commission have refused to recognise Independence as a legitimate option.

Censorship? don't make me laugh
11 May 2009 at 10:32
Owen Polley said…
Firstly, the national conversation predates the Calman Commission.Ok. That’s a mistake, but largely an irrelevant one, given that it is the SNP itself which has promoted the idea that its initiative is an alternative to the ‘unacceptable’ Calman Commission.

Secondlt the Calman commission explicitly refuses to discuss independence as one of a number of options, it's not that hard to understand why that might not be exactly inviting to a party whose core aim is Scottish Independence.The Calman Commission considers the workings of devolution. The majority of Scots do not want independence, so to speculate on the workings of that option would be anti-democratic.

And in any event, the Scottish Government has indeed submitted information to the Calman Commission on fiscla powers and Mike Russell has signalled that he will input further but only on the basis that the Scottish Government states it's preference for normal independence.It has failed to take a full part in the Commission, as you have already indicated.

You've got to ask yourself, who contacts their MSP because they had a few posts deleted on a forum (that's if it ever actually happened)Someone who feels their voice is being silenced.

Unlike the Calman Commission, the National Conversation is considering every opotion, to date the Calman commission have refused to recognise Independence as a legitimate option.Because its remit is to consider devolution and its workings. The question of independence is a separate issue which depends on referenda.
11 May 2009 at 11:20
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football fever in Russia

Russia Blog is getting excited about Euro 2008. Indeed it is drawing parallels between Guus Hiddink and Peter the Great in terms of successful Russo-Dutch exchanges of expertise. Meanwhile, in Moscow, fans have been taking to the streets in order to celebrate the national team’s achievements.
Read more

Stormont might not collapse but paramilitaries continue to disfigure Northern Ireland

Image
The devolved institutions in Northern Ireland are supposedly ‘teetering on the brink’ of collapse yet again.  After repeated failures to agree a balanced budget or implement welfare reform created months of uncertainty, the Executive’s future is now in doubt because the PSNI believes members of the IRA were involved in murdering a republican hit man.  Despite its apparent seriousness, this particular predicament is unlikely to bring the shaky edifice at Stormont crashing down. The IRA was supposed to have disbanded its military ‘structures’ and decommissioned its entire arsenal of weapons back in 2005.  It was on the basis of this understanding that power-sharing resumed in 2007 and the DUP entered government with Sinn Féin.  From the outset it was a fairly flimsy pretext.   Less than a year after John de Chastelain, the retired Canadian general, oversaw decommissioning, the Independent Monitoring Commission reported that the IRA retained a substantial haul of arms.
Read more

Walker loada rubbish

Former BBC employee Brian Walker has overrun Slugger O’Toole lately with countless poorly structured, poorly written posts. It is possible quickly to recognize and avoid these by subjecting each Slugger piece to a cursory inspection and identifying those which feature characteristic lack of paragraphing and a tenuous grasp on the technicalities of linking source articles. Although I generally evade Walker’s posts by this method, occasionally (and unfortunately) I have persevered and found that their content is as unrewarding as the style in which they are written. Today, for instance, I inflicted upon myself Brian’s thoughts on a mooted Fianna Fail / SDLP merger . In actual fact, he is right to welcome news that the Southern Irish party has dropped this proposal from its agenda; however, the logic by which he arrives at this conclusion is parochial nonsense. To summarise, Walker believes that pursuing realignment with larger parties, whether they are from the rest of the UK or fro
Read more