Thursday, 24 December 2009

Paisley Junior's geography awry


Ian Paisley Junior clearly isn't on his hols yet (or at least the DUP press office is still at work). Christmas Eve morning witnessed a press release on the party's current most pressing preoccupation - its rival's internal candidate selection procedure. The website only features a truncated version, but its is the unabridged text which provides the authentic Junior pyrotechnics (ho hum!).

The Labour tendencies of leading members of South Belfast UUP are well-known. Does this explain the Tory insistence on imposing a blow-in upon the local UUP Association? The Tories are now insisting that all who refuse to subscribe to their views must be purged from consideration as UUP candidates, as has been demonstrated by the Tory intolerance towards the UUP’s solitary MP.

The UUP is being hollowed out at the behest of a party who when they last contested an election in South Belfast got 108 votes. Experienced veterans are being pushed aside in favour of a bunch of Notting Hill liberals who don’t understand Unionism and cant represent our community”, said the MLA


Confused? I don't blame you!

Junior is clearly appalled that the UUP's left leaning representatives have been overlooked in the South Belfast constituency, yet he is also adamantly opposed to 'Notting Hill liberals'.

It is a formulation which recalls David McNarry's 'wide-boy liberalista' outburst. And it makes as little sense. Neither of the probable South Belfast candidates, Peter McCann and Paula Bradshaw, is from London, or England. They have 'blown in' from nowhere more exotic than other areas of Belfast. Indeed Paula has a long history of community work in South Belfast.

I'd like to believe that a 'seasoned veteran' standing in the constituency would have commanded Paisley's support. I hadn't realised he was such a fan of Michael McGimpsey or Bob Stoker. But the truth is that the former has an important job in the Northern Ireland Executive which has quite rightly precluded him from a Westminster contest. Clearly Conservatives and Unionists, unlike the DUP, are taking seriously their pledge to abolish double mandates.

Either of the two UCUNF selectees who remain would make a much better MP than the DUP's likely candidate, Jimmy Spratt, another prospective double-jobber. They may not conform to Paisley's little-Ulster reading of unionism, but they are thoroughly compatible with the UK wide vision which the New Force seeks to promote.

6 comments:

rutherford said...

That press release contains everything that is wrong with Unionism in NI as it currently exists.

A blow in from West Belfast? Notting Hill Liberal? don't understand unionism? 'Unionist community'?

They might as well have added to that list that to top it all, McCann was a Catholic.

The bluster of little Ulsterism with the undercurrent of naked sectarianism included. Merry Xmas!

rutherford said...

btw, has the article been pulled from their site?

Seymour Major said...

It looks very much like a sign of the campaign to come. Once the 18 candidates are announced, this is the kind of abuse that the CUs can expect to receive from the DUP.

A "straight bat" is what is required in response to this type of negative campaigning. The most effective way to deal with it is to ignore it and simply to campaign positively on the Conservative manifesto.

James Riled said...

Rutherford - like your comments.

The naked sectarianism that exists within the DUP needs to be coldly exposed.

Isn't there any MSM journalist out there willing to do a bit of under cover on this?

Sam Stokes said...

Seymour Major you're absolutely right.

Don't let the DUP suck us in to the useless vortex of their level of debate.

They may well be obsessed with the maintenance of head count politics but the electorate isn't.

The more Paisley Jnr and others bluster on this, the more and more irrelevant they make themselves.

By the way, did anyone ever tell the DUP there's a recession on?

Anonymous said...

Just shows how concerned the DUP are with the TUV and CU's. They will lose 40- 50% of their vote where both the other parties run.