Hard reality to trump dreams? Hodgson managerial favourite ahead of Liverpool legend.

It’s beginning to look like Fulham manager Roy Hodgson could be the man to take over from Rafa Benitez at Anfield.  Several outlets report that Liverpool will approach the London club in the next 48 hours.  It is not considered likely that Fulham asking compensation of £2 million or so would derail any deal.  

The move could raise a dilemma of ‘heads over hearts’ for Liverpool fans.  Because it appears that Kenny Dalglish has expressed his readiness to take up the reins at the club, for the first time since resigning as manager, way back in 1991.

Dalglish was the last man to deliver a league title to Anfield and he went on to do an astonishing job at Blackburn Rovers.  The Scot is now in charge of Liverpool‘s youth Academy, but he hasn’t managed at senior level since 2000, when he spent a brief period in charge of Celtic.

It had been reported that Dalglish was tasked, along with managing director Christian Purslow, with compiling a shortlist of candidates.  For the Liverpool faithful, ’King Kenny’s’ thumbs up would represent an important endorsement for any new manager.

Now the Daily Post has cast doubt on the nature of Dalglish’s role in the recruitment process.  It suggests that, although he is prepared to accept the board’s decision, and support it, he did not play a part vetting prospective candidates.

The legendary Anfield striker instead wants the job for himself, and he believes he has the credentials to take control, after a break of almost twenty years.  It complicates a situation which is already far from ideal.

Unlike Hodgson, Dalglish could count upon the Kop’s unwavering devotion if he were to become manager.  Unlike Hodgson, Dalglish would be likely to restore a positive attitude and fans could look forward to a period of attacking football.

However, without money to bring in the quality which Liverpool currently lacks, there could be an element of Kevin Keegan’s last spell at Newcastle, about any Kenny Dalglish return.  It is extremely unlikely that past glories would be revisited until new ownership is secured.  

If the owners were to hand Kenny the job, it would be their most popular move since stumping up the cash for Fernando Torres.  It could, conceivably, relieve the pressure on Hicks and Gillett, allowing them to take a more leisurely, or greedy, approach to selling the club.

On the other hand, appointing Hodgson is practically an admission of defeat.  He has managed a top level European club just once before, stabilising Inter Milan and building a characteristically solid, unspectacular outfit.  Cynics will say that is precisely what Liverpool needs.

If the current owners stay, then expectations at Anfield have to be adjusted accordingly.  The club can’t afford to bring in, or retain, quality players.  It needs a manager who can squeeze the best out of a workmanlike squad, keep it in contention for a European place and occasionally create an upset against a genuine title contender.

Liverpool, a giant in world football, has not been in that position since the days of Shankly.  It would be the hardest dose of reality to go back there, but that is what a move for Hodgson represents.

Dalglish, in contrast, is a hopeful appointment.  But, with the current difficulties afflicting the club, does he symbolise unrealisable dreams rather than hard reality?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Football fever in Russia

Russia Blog is getting excited about Euro 2008. Indeed it is drawing parallels between Guus Hiddink and Peter the Great in terms of successful Russo-Dutch exchanges of expertise. Meanwhile, in Moscow, fans have been taking to the streets in order to celebrate the national team’s achievements.
Read more

Stormont might not collapse but paramilitaries continue to disfigure Northern Ireland

Image
The devolved institutions in Northern Ireland are supposedly ‘teetering on the brink’ of collapse yet again.  After repeated failures to agree a balanced budget or implement welfare reform created months of uncertainty, the Executive’s future is now in doubt because the PSNI believes members of the IRA were involved in murdering a republican hit man.  Despite its apparent seriousness, this particular predicament is unlikely to bring the shaky edifice at Stormont crashing down. The IRA was supposed to have disbanded its military ‘structures’ and decommissioned its entire arsenal of weapons back in 2005.  It was on the basis of this understanding that power-sharing resumed in 2007 and the DUP entered government with Sinn Féin.  From the outset it was a fairly flimsy pretext.   Less than a year after John de Chastelain, the retired Canadian general, oversaw decommissioning, the Independent Monitoring Commission reported that the IRA retained a substantial haul of arms.
Read more

Walker loada rubbish

Former BBC employee Brian Walker has overrun Slugger O’Toole lately with countless poorly structured, poorly written posts. It is possible quickly to recognize and avoid these by subjecting each Slugger piece to a cursory inspection and identifying those which feature characteristic lack of paragraphing and a tenuous grasp on the technicalities of linking source articles. Although I generally evade Walker’s posts by this method, occasionally (and unfortunately) I have persevered and found that their content is as unrewarding as the style in which they are written. Today, for instance, I inflicted upon myself Brian’s thoughts on a mooted Fianna Fail / SDLP merger . In actual fact, he is right to welcome news that the Southern Irish party has dropped this proposal from its agenda; however, the logic by which he arrives at this conclusion is parochial nonsense. To summarise, Walker believes that pursuing realignment with larger parties, whether they are from the rest of the UK or fro
Read more