Unionism and Irishness
On a couple of occasions people have mentioned that I might have certain common ground with the Union Group. This has surprised me, as other than a desire to see unionism presenting itself in a more articulate and thoughtful manner, there is little in the Group’s documents which I could subscribe to.
Central to the documents they have produced are assumptions which I regard as wrong. Firstly they assume that the issue of the Union can only be understood in terms of identity politics, ceding the argument that unionism is a better or more inclusive political philosophy than Irish nationalism. The Union Group’s thesis is that to be inclusive, both political traditions on the island must be accorded equal status. That rather undermines the entire concept of being a unionist and is reflected in the all-Ireland vision the group outlines.
While national identity is an important aspect of Irish politics, it is not the only consideration in ordering a state or political arrangements, nor in my view is it the best one. A civic political identity can be established which need not threaten religious, cultural or national identities which can be subscribed to in parallel. I see the United Kingdom as a multinational, multicultural state which nevertheless has a strong civic identity fostered by a shared history, shared values and shared institutions.
It is a unionist’s job to advance this argument, not to concede that the contrary view is equally legitimate or to stop persuading people in any community, whether they consider themselves British, Irish, neither or both, that their interests are best represented within the United Kingdom.
I think what offends me most about the Union Group’s papers, is that although their rhetoric is grounded in liberal intentions, their thinking is not so very far from Sinn Fein and the DUP. They view the Northern Ireland political divide in purely ethno-nationalist terms. They make allusions to a more complex picture by quoting John Hewitt, but there is no sense in which they attempt to divorce political identity from a sense of cultural or ethnic nationality. People can identify themselves as they wish, seems to be the message, but generally unionists aren’t Irish and Irish Catholics aren’t British. That to me, is to throw the liberal unionist baby out with the bathwater. The task for liberal unionists should be articulating unionism a way that includes the Irish national identity.
The John Hewitt quote I have mentioned is as follows:
I am a Belfast man,I am an Ulster man,I am British and I am Irish,And those last two are interchangeable,And I am European and anyone who demeans,Any one part of me demeans me as a person.
It concludes the 21st Century Unionism document and frankly it is the most interesting part of it (the document’s equality-speak is impeccable – but there’s little which really addresses unionism’s future within the document). The quote is as good a jumping off point as any for the debate about the Irish identity within unionism, and for discussing this issue, at least, the Union Group must be congratulated. Interestingly as I’ve been writing this post, a debate about the relationship between Irishness and unionism has also sprung up on Slugger O’Toole.
A commenter makes the correct observation that those unionists who reject any notion of Irishness strengthen the case of those who would define the identity in purely Gaelic, Catholic terms and weaken their own position in the eyes of the world. Thus the twin strains of ethnic, identity based politics perpetuate each other’s exclusivist outlook.
The narrow idea of Irishness articulated by Irish ethno-nationalists and supported by their Ulster opponents is vocal on Irish language issues, . The Gaelic / ethno-nationalist strand views Gaelige as an intrinsic and defining part of Irishness. The ethno-religious strand of unionism detests the language because its assumption is that this must be correct. Balanced, inclusive unionism acknowledges the language’s history and cultural significance within Ireland and the United Kingdom, but rejects linguistic or religious criteria as necessary for political identification. This pattern is repeated for many aspects of culture and tradition which are considered Irish.
Unionism must reject identity as the prime determinant of political allegiance and as such it is wrong to be prescriptive about the identities which unionists should feel. It is certainly a trend however, that unionists who are comfortable with being referred to as Irish and see Irishness as a vital part of the makeup of their cultural identity, are by far the more self-confident, articulate and consistent proponents of the Union.
Where I feel that the Union Group are mistaken, is in assuming that embracing the Irish part of our identity means diluting our unionism or being apologetic for our allegiance to the United Kingdom. Their documents are useful in that they allude to the complexity of identity which many of us feel but they have few ideas which would actively strengthen the Union and they place little emphasis on Irishness being as vital and intrinsic to the UK as it is to the Republic of Ireland.
I return once again to David Trimble paraphrasing Emerson Tennant “we add to the glory of being British, the distinction of being Irish”.
Central to the documents they have produced are assumptions which I regard as wrong. Firstly they assume that the issue of the Union can only be understood in terms of identity politics, ceding the argument that unionism is a better or more inclusive political philosophy than Irish nationalism. The Union Group’s thesis is that to be inclusive, both political traditions on the island must be accorded equal status. That rather undermines the entire concept of being a unionist and is reflected in the all-Ireland vision the group outlines.
While national identity is an important aspect of Irish politics, it is not the only consideration in ordering a state or political arrangements, nor in my view is it the best one. A civic political identity can be established which need not threaten religious, cultural or national identities which can be subscribed to in parallel. I see the United Kingdom as a multinational, multicultural state which nevertheless has a strong civic identity fostered by a shared history, shared values and shared institutions.
It is a unionist’s job to advance this argument, not to concede that the contrary view is equally legitimate or to stop persuading people in any community, whether they consider themselves British, Irish, neither or both, that their interests are best represented within the United Kingdom.
I think what offends me most about the Union Group’s papers, is that although their rhetoric is grounded in liberal intentions, their thinking is not so very far from Sinn Fein and the DUP. They view the Northern Ireland political divide in purely ethno-nationalist terms. They make allusions to a more complex picture by quoting John Hewitt, but there is no sense in which they attempt to divorce political identity from a sense of cultural or ethnic nationality. People can identify themselves as they wish, seems to be the message, but generally unionists aren’t Irish and Irish Catholics aren’t British. That to me, is to throw the liberal unionist baby out with the bathwater. The task for liberal unionists should be articulating unionism a way that includes the Irish national identity.
The John Hewitt quote I have mentioned is as follows:
I am a Belfast man,I am an Ulster man,I am British and I am Irish,And those last two are interchangeable,And I am European and anyone who demeans,Any one part of me demeans me as a person.
It concludes the 21st Century Unionism document and frankly it is the most interesting part of it (the document’s equality-speak is impeccable – but there’s little which really addresses unionism’s future within the document). The quote is as good a jumping off point as any for the debate about the Irish identity within unionism, and for discussing this issue, at least, the Union Group must be congratulated. Interestingly as I’ve been writing this post, a debate about the relationship between Irishness and unionism has also sprung up on Slugger O’Toole.
A commenter makes the correct observation that those unionists who reject any notion of Irishness strengthen the case of those who would define the identity in purely Gaelic, Catholic terms and weaken their own position in the eyes of the world. Thus the twin strains of ethnic, identity based politics perpetuate each other’s exclusivist outlook.
The narrow idea of Irishness articulated by Irish ethno-nationalists and supported by their Ulster opponents is vocal on Irish language issues, . The Gaelic / ethno-nationalist strand views Gaelige as an intrinsic and defining part of Irishness. The ethno-religious strand of unionism detests the language because its assumption is that this must be correct. Balanced, inclusive unionism acknowledges the language’s history and cultural significance within Ireland and the United Kingdom, but rejects linguistic or religious criteria as necessary for political identification. This pattern is repeated for many aspects of culture and tradition which are considered Irish.
Unionism must reject identity as the prime determinant of political allegiance and as such it is wrong to be prescriptive about the identities which unionists should feel. It is certainly a trend however, that unionists who are comfortable with being referred to as Irish and see Irishness as a vital part of the makeup of their cultural identity, are by far the more self-confident, articulate and consistent proponents of the Union.
Where I feel that the Union Group are mistaken, is in assuming that embracing the Irish part of our identity means diluting our unionism or being apologetic for our allegiance to the United Kingdom. Their documents are useful in that they allude to the complexity of identity which many of us feel but they have few ideas which would actively strengthen the Union and they place little emphasis on Irishness being as vital and intrinsic to the UK as it is to the Republic of Ireland.
I return once again to David Trimble paraphrasing Emerson Tennant “we add to the glory of being British, the distinction of being Irish”.
Comments
Why does everything have to about one thing being better than the other? Being British and Irish is not better than being Irish or indeed just being British (a label used by plenty of people in Britain, especially minorities, who don't identify with being English or Welsh or Scottish). It's not a game where the person with the most nationalities wins. My children have three national influences, that doesn't make them better than somebody Irish (or British) growing up in Ireland.
To quote michael noonan fine gael on a political debate with unionists long ago 'We are all here now' on the island, and we just have to face up to that reality and all give up on exclusivity.
that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels.
I'll appreciate if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
Feel free to surf to my webpage: Abercrombie Fitch Belgique
your situation; we have developed some nice practices and we are looking to swap solutions with others, why not shoot me an email
if interested.
Feel free to visit my page ... Abercrombie & Fitch
Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?
Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it's rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.
my webpage :: Louis Vuitton Outlet Online
the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries
that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit
the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects ,
people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
Thanks
my page; Louis Vuitton Bags
effective. A lot of times it's very hard to get that "perfect balance" between superb usability and appearance. I must say you have done a superb job with this. In addition, the blog loads super fast for me on Internet explorer. Exceptional Blog!
Here is my web page - Home Page
songs existing at this website is really marvelous.
Also visit my web site: Click This Link
What web host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate link in your host?
I want my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol
my webpage; Read This
site which offers these kinds of data in
quality?
Here is my page ... Chaussure De Foot
thanks.
Here is my blog post ... Abercrombie Pas Cher
matter, your web site got here up, it seems good. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
Hello there, simply became alert to your blog via Google, and found that it's really informative.
I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful should you continue this in future.
Numerous folks might be benefited from your writing.
Cheers!
Feel free to surf to my weblog :: Sac Louis Vuitton
The sector hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to mention how they believe.
At all times go after your heart.
Look at my website Cheap NFL Jerseys
My blog Recommended Site
net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.
But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on numerous websites for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform.
I have heard excellent things about blogengine.net. Is there
a way I can import all my wordpress content into it?
Any help would be really appreciated!
Here is my web-site: Get More Information
Here is my web page Michael Kors Outlet
my website Cheap Jerseys ()
posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website.
Reading this information So i'm happy to express that I've an incredibly good uncanny feeling
I came upon exactly what I needed. I so much no doubt will make sure to don?
t overlook this website and provides it a look
on a continuing basis.
My website Chaussure De Foot Pas Cher