Stop rewarding paramilitaries
The BBC’s Spotlight programme recently investigated a murky
tale of intimidation and the relationships between paramilitaries and the
authorities, in Bangor. When unwanted flags were erected in Clandeboye
Estate, the police, council officials and politicians advised residents’
representatives to negotiate with a local UDA commander for their removal. The documentary revealed the extent to which
paramilitaries still exert an influence on loyalist areas and how funding finds
its way to the community organisations they direct.
None of this is very surprising, though it is not often reported
in such detail. Not only do
paramilitaries continue to exist; to an extent the ‘peace process’ was built
upon entrenching the influence of these groups and their proxies within
loyalist and republican neighbourhoods.
The old tactics of intimidation and violence may have been
supplemented by a plethora of residents’ associations, cultural societies and
community workers, all funded by public money, but many of the same people are
in charge and on the payroll.
There are initiatives which purportedly aim to dilute their
influence, or help the organisations to disappear completely. The Fresh Start Agreement, brokered after a
murder was linked to the Provisional IRA, sets up a panel to advise the
Executive on disbanding paramilitary structures and an Independent Reporting
Commission, to monitor the groups’ activities.
It has attracted controversy already, as Deputy First Minister and
onetime IRA commander, Martin McGuinness, gets to nominate members of the
Commission.
Meanwhile, Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair’s former Chief of
Staff, worked with loyalists to form a ‘Communities Council’ (LCC), which aims
to bring groups “in from the cold”.
There is justifiable cynicism about its goals and chances of
success. The LCC is raising cash to
‘transform’ loyalist areas. Is it simply
another way of directing cash toward former and current paramilitaries?
In republican communities, the provisional movement used its
stranglehold to cultivate a political mandate, whereas loyalists failed to move
beyond community organisations. However,
in both cases their authority remains underwritten by paramilitary structures
still in existence and possessing a potential for violence.
Until paramilitaries, past and present, are seen as a
cautionary tale in our society, rather than sources of authority, aspirational
figures or romantic heroes, communities will remain in their grip. The biggest challenge is to counter versions
of history which promote the idea that violence was justified or anything other
than a horrific failure. That means
ensuring that public money goes directly into benefitting communities, rather
than paying paramilitary members and former members, or funding projects which
glorify their bloody past.
Published first in the News Letter. 21 March 2016.
Comments