Cross party think tank proposes 'new Act of Union'
Two recent articles on Three
Thousand Versts have expressed concern that the UK’s constitutional issues have
been allowed to drift, since the ‘No’ campaign won the Scottish independence
referendum. With that in mind, it was interesting to read a piece in yesterday’s Sunday Times, proposing a new Act of Union. (Free version here): http://www.constitutionreformgroup.co.uk/only-a-new-act-of-union-can-save-the-uk-from-break-up/
The article launches a cross-party group called the
Constitution Reform Group and carries the signatures of Sir Menzies Campbell,
Peter Hain and Robert (Lord) Salisbury, who belong to the Liberal Democrat,
Labour and Conservative parties, respectively.
The group, it claims, consists of “retired cabinet ministers, practising
politicians, former parliamentary officials and civil servants, lawyers,
journalists and academics”.
The authors express concern about the government’s provisions
to create ‘English votes for English Laws’ on the basis that they will create
two classes of MP in the House of Commons.
Using parliament’s standing orders as a vehicle to effect constitutional
change adds to the impenetrability of the UK’s constitution, they say.
‘The bones of the constitution should clear and
understandable to any interested citizen, not just legislative anoraks.’
The Constitution Reform Group believes that nationalism’s
threat to the UK is current and serious.
It proposes to write a paper on how a new Act of Union might
look, in time for elections to the devolved legislatures in Scotland, Northern
Ireland and Wales, scheduled for May 2016.
A more urgent debate on the United Kingdom’s future
is certainly needed. Hopefully this
group can make a useful contribution to strengthening the Union against
nationalist challenges and repairing bonds between the various nations and
regions of the UK.
Comments