MH17 passengers victims of a preventable war
I’ve just returned from two weeks in Cuba - not the
easiest place from which to follow world news.
The internet is restricted and slow, wifi scarcely exists and the
English language edition of the island’s only daily newspaper, Granma, publishes
mainly stagnant propaganda on behalf of the Castro brothers.
As a result, I’ve had to catch up with the tragic story of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, which crashed in eastern Ukraine on its scheduled route between Amsterdam
and Kuala Lumpur, resulting in almost 300 deaths. Western countries and the current authorities in Kiev claim that the passenger plane was struck by a missile fired by ‘pro-Russian’
forces and supplied by Russia. These
allegations are refuted by the separatists and have drawn a flat denial from
the government in Moscow.
For the time being, it is difficult to determine the exact
truth. Investigators from the
Netherlands are struggling to access the crash site, which lies in territory fiercely
contested by both sides in Ukraine’s civil war.
It is certainly likely enough that the plane was mistaken for a Ukrainian
military aircraft and shot down. It is
also possible that the US government is manipulating intelligence information,
to distort aspects of the incident deliberately, for propaganda purposes.
Whatever the precise details, this loss of life is another
tragic result of war. The eastern part
of Ukraine has become an out and out warzone within Europe, with all the
dreadful consequences which that entails.
There are dangers now in the air above the contested region, as well as
on the ground. Human Rights Watch says
that forces loyal to the facto government in Kiev have been launching unguided
Grad missiles aimed at suburbs around Donetsk and at the weekend there were
reports of more civilian casualties.
War causes chaos, misery and death, often indiscriminately and
almost always impacting civilians directly.
Its effects can easily spill out beyond the confines of the warzone.
It is easy to cast Vladimir Putin as the villain whose
nationalist ambitions have plunged Ukraine into anarchy and Russia’s opportunism
when it annexed Crimea was one of the defining moments of the crisis. However, it was not Putin's government that sponsored ‘regime change’ on the streets of Kiev, targeting a President who was,
for all his faults, elected democratically.
Ukrainians, whether they look to Washington or Moscow, are victims of governments which have used them as the rope in a political ‘tug
of war’, resulting in a vicious civil conflict. They have been joined now in their
victimhood by the passengers of flight MH17.
Comments