tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post6891508571302150604..comments2024-03-28T17:49:01.125+00:00Comments on Three Thousand Versts of Loneliness: No public interest in revealing Jack Night's identityOwen Polleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00567787385096905811noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-51878600487384621012024-03-12T11:44:44.018+00:002024-03-12T11:44:44.018+00:00giannis shoes
jordans shoes
off white outlet<a href="http://www.giannisantetokounmposhoes.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>giannis shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.jordansshoes.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>jordans shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.nikeoffwhite.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>off white outlet</strong></a><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-31321742898848323542009-06-18T02:48:02.096+01:002009-06-18T02:48:02.096+01:00It's very sad. Night Jack was a brilliant blog...It's very sad. Night Jack was a brilliant blog and I hadn't even read most of it.<br /><br />The actions of The Times are petty and vindictive.Safiya Outlineshttp://getoutlines.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-83892659579638871692009-06-17T20:01:40.455+01:002009-06-17T20:01:40.455+01:00I should have said the judge introduced a battle o...I should have said the judge introduced a battle of public interests argument.Owen Polleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00567787385096905811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-72578437372024683762009-06-17T20:00:55.301+01:002009-06-17T20:00:55.301+01:00I think it is about journalistic ethics largely. ...I think it is about journalistic ethics largely. But the judge did bring a balance of public interests which I think he might have omitted. There is no public interest in unmasking this man as far as I'm concerned. Legally the paper is entitled to do so, but there was no need for the judge to justify its editorial decision with a specious interest argument.Owen Polleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00567787385096905811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-636016736342835022009-06-17T17:42:23.118+01:002009-06-17T17:42:23.118+01:00Quite honestly, this is not a case where the law c...Quite honestly, this is not a case where the law could ever help. It is unarguable that blogging is a public activity. Jack night was never going to succeed using privacy law. <br /><br />However, he may have a legal argument if he is disciplined. Under employment law, a person has a right not to be dismissed for disclosure of confidential information (even if it is against the terms of the contract) if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in not disclosing it.<br /><br />Perhaps this is really about journalistic ethics - if there are any at all. At the moment, it seems that 'dog eats dog' is the order of the day.Seymour Majornoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-28545667379531441572009-06-17T07:48:05.939+01:002009-06-17T07:48:05.939+01:00The final irony, the winner of the Orwell Prize br...The final irony, the winner of the Orwell Prize brought down by the forces of Orwellianism.<br /><br />His piece in the Times is a sad one:<br /><br />http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6515061.eceO'Neillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02531858236570346203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-31446743734964589582009-06-16T22:19:39.288+01:002009-06-16T22:19:39.288+01:00Disciplined by the force and the blog has been ta...Disciplined by the force and the blog has been taken down.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10176870158298416782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2623721153002721356.post-12564344246428961502009-06-16T20:44:34.594+01:002009-06-16T20:44:34.594+01:00Completely agree, it is a shame that the Times has...Completely agree, it is a shame that the Times has gone ahead with this - and it is also a shame that the courts have decided not to protect his identity.<br /><br />I haven't read much of his blog at all (apparently he has taken it down) but I look forward to his book.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com